Download Clearview Hwy For Free, View Sample Text, Rating And More On Fontsgeek.com.
Speed limit traffic sign inTraffic signs or road signs are signs erected at the side of or above to give instructions or provide information to road users. The earliest signs were simple wooden or stone milestones. Later, signs with directional arms were introduced, for example, the in the United Kingdom and their.With traffic volumes increasing since the 1930s, many countries have adopted pictorial signs or otherwise simplified and standardized their signs to overcome language barriers, and enhance traffic safety. Such pictorial signs use symbols (often silhouettes) in place of words and are usually based on international protocols. Such signs were first developed in Europe, and have been adopted by most countries to varying degrees.
5 or more signs may be displayed on one post. Speed camera sign used in Canada, Cyprus, the Czech Republic, Estonia, Finland, Georgia, Hong Kong, Iceland, Iran, Ireland, Latvia, Malta, Poland, Saudi Arabia, Ukraine, the United Arab Emirates, and the United KingdomThe earliest road signs were, giving distance or direction; for example, the erected stone columns throughout their empire giving the distance to Rome. In the, multidirectional signs at intersections became common, giving directions to cities and towns.In 1686, the first known Traffic Regulation Act in Europe is established by King.
This act foresees the placement of in the narrowest streets of, stating which traffic should back up to give way. One of these signs still exists at Salvador street, in.The first modern road signs erected on a wide scale were designed for riders of high or 'ordinary' bicycles in the late 1870s and early 1880s. These machines were fast, silent and their nature made them difficult to control, moreover their riders travelled considerable distances and often preferred to tour on unfamiliar roads. For such riders, began to erect signs that warned of potential hazards ahead (particularly steep hills), rather than merely giving distance or directions to places, thereby contributing the sign type that defines 'modern' traffic signs.The development of automobiles encouraged more complex using more than just text-based notices. One of the first modern-day road sign systems was devised by the Italian Touring Club in 1895.
By 1900, a Congress of the International League of Touring Organizations in Paris was considering proposals for standardization of road signage. In 1903 the British government introduced four 'national' signs based on shape, but the basic patterns of most traffic signs were set at the 1908 in. In 1909, nine European governments agreed on the use of four pictorial symbols, indicating 'bump', 'curve', 'intersection', and 'grade-level railroad crossing'. The intensive work on international road signs that took place between 1926 and 1949 eventually led to the development of the European road sign system. Both Britain and the United States developed their own road signage systems, both of which were adopted or modified by many other nations in their respective spheres of influence.
The UK adopted a version of the European road signs in 1964 and, over past decades, North American signage began using some symbols and graphics mixed in with English.Over the years, change was gradual. Pre-industrial signs were stone or wood, but with the development of Darby's method of smelting iron using coke, painted cast iron became favoured in the late 18th and 19th centuries. Cast iron continued to be used until the mid-20th century, but it was gradually displaced by aluminium or other materials and processes, such as vitreous enamelled and/or pressed malleable iron, or (later) steel. Since 1945 most signs have been made from sheet aluminium with adhesive plastic coatings; these are normally for nighttime and low-light visibility.
Before the development of reflective plastics, reflectivity was provided by glass reflectors set into the lettering and symbols.New generations of traffic signs based on electronic displays can also change their text (or, in some countries, symbols) to provide for 'intelligent control' linked to automated traffic sensors or remote manual input. In over 20 countries, real-time incident warnings are conveyed directly to vehicle navigation systems using inaudible signals carried via FM radio, 3G cellular data and satellite broadcasts.
Finally, cars can pay tolls and trucks pass safety screening checks using video numberplate scanning, or RFID transponders in windshields linked to antennae over the road, in support of on-board signalling, toll collection, and travel time monitoring.Yet another 'medium' for transferring information ordinarily associated with visible signs is, e.g., 'talking signs' for print-handicapped (including blind/low-vision/illiterate) people. These are infra-red transmitters serving the same purpose as the usual graphic signs when received by an appropriate device such as a hand-held receiver or one built into a cell phone. With the word Tomare (止まれ), meaning StopRoad signs in Japan are either controlled by local police authorities under Road Traffic Law ( 道路交通法, Dōro Kōtsūhō) or by other road-controlling entities including, local municipalities, (companies controlling expressways), under Road Law ( 道路法, Dōrohō). Most of the design of the road signs in Japan are similar to the signs on the, except for some significant variances, such as stop sign with a red downward triangle.
The main signs are categorized into four meaning types:. Guidance (white characters on blue in general – on green in expressways),. Warning (black characters and symbols on yellow diamond),.
Regulation (red or blue circle, depending on prohibition or regulation),. And instruction (mostly white characters or symbols on blue square).Korea. Route marker sign for, as seen on and the Maharlika Highway.Road signs in the Philippines are standardized in the Road Signs and Pavement Markings Manual, published by the.
Philippine road signage practice closely follow those used in, but with local adaptations and some minor influences from the US. However, some road signs may differ by locale, and mostly diverge from the national standard. For example, the (MMDA) has used pink and light blue in its signage for which it has been heavily criticised.Road signs in the Philippines are classified as:. Regulatory signs.
Warning signs. Guide signs. Expressway signs. Traffic instruction signsRegulatory road signs – other than the stop and give way signs – are generally circular, with (for prohibitions) a black symbol on a white background within a red border, or (for mandatory instructions) a white symbol on a blue background.
In some cases circular regulatory signs are placed on white rectangular panels together with text supplementing their meanings.Most warning signs display a black symbol on a white background within a red-bordered equilateral triangle. Since 2012, however, a more visibly distinctive design (taken from that used for school signs in the US) has been adopted for pedestrian-related signs: these consist of a fluorescent yellow-green pentagon with black border and symbol. Additional panels may be placed below signs to supplement their meanings.Guide signs are divided into directional signs, service area signs, route markers, and tourist-related signs, with influence from both American and Australian practice.
Directional signs use a green background with white letters and arrows. Service area signs use a blue background with white letters, arrows, and symbols.
Tourist-related signs use a brown background with white letters, arrows, and symbols. The, excluding the route marker, is based on the Australian National Route marker, but reserved for future use.Signs on expressways mostly take elements from signs. Exit signs, wrong way signs and start/end of expressway signs are very similar to Australian freeway signage. Traffic instruction signs are textual signs used to supplement warning and regulatory signs.Saudi Arabia. Road sign in, France - entrance to built up area with an implied 50 kilometres per hour (31 mph) speed limit.Since the signing of the 1931 Geneva Convention concerning the Unification of Road Signals by a number of countries that the standardization of the traffic signs started in Europe. The 1931 Convention rules were developed in the 1949 Geneva Protocol on Road Signs and Signals.In 1968, the European countries signed the treaty, with the aim of standardizing traffic regulations in participating countries in order to facilitate international road traffic and to increase road safety. Part of the treaty was the, which defined the traffic signs and signals.
As a result, in Western Europe the traffic signs are well standardized, although there are still some country-specific exceptions, mostly dating from the pre-1968 era.The principle of the European traffic sign standard is that certain shapes and colours are to be used with consistent meanings:. Triangular signs (black symbols on a white or yellow background) warn of dangers. The Vienna Convention additionally allows an alternative shape for such signs, namely a right-angled diamond – although in Europe this shape is regularly used only in the. Regulatory signs are round: those indicating a prohibition or limit are black on white (or yellow) with a red border; those giving a mandatory order are white on blue. Informational and various other secondary signs are of rectangular shape.
The animals which may be depicted on warning signs include cattle, deer, ducks, elk, frogs, horses, sheep, monkeys (in ), and (on ). The Convention allows any animal image to be used.Directional signs ('guide signs' in American parlance) have not been harmonized under the Convention, at least not on ordinary roads. As a result, there are substantial differences in directional signage throughout Europe. Differences apply to the choice of typeface, arrows and, most notably, colours.
Main article:Until the partition of in 1922 and the independence of the (now the ), British standards applied across the island. In 1926 road sign standards similar to those used in the UK at the time were adopted. Law requires that the signs be written in both and English.In 1956, road signs in the were changed from the UK standard with the adoption of US-style 'diamond' signs for many road hazard warnings (junctions, bends, railway crossings, traffic lights). Some domestic signs were also invented, such as the keep-left sign (a black curved arrow pointing to the upper-left, although some are similar to the European 'white arrow on blue disk' signs), while some other signs are not widely adopted outside Ireland, such as the no-entry sign (a black arrow pointing ahead in a white circle with a red slashed circumference).Directional signage is similar to current United Kingdom standards. The same colours are used for directional signs in Ireland as in the UK, and the UK Transport and Motorway fonts are used. Unlike Wales and Scotland, where Welsh and Gaelic place-names use the upright Transport face, Irish place-names are rendered in an italic face.In January 2005 Ireland adopted metric speed limits.
Around 35,000 existing signs were replaced and a further 23,000 new signs erected bearing the speed limit in kilometres per hour. To avoid confusion with the old signs, each speed limit sign now has 'km/h' beneath the numerals. Also, since the adoption of signs based on the Warboys Committee standard in 1977, Irish directional signs have used the metric system; however, unlike with the later speed limit changeover, there was no effort made to change the existing signage, and as of 2007 many finger posts still remain on rural roads with distances in miles, although the numbers continue to decline as roads are improved.In late 2007 Ireland began an extensive programme of sign and post replacement. Good examples are the M1 (–) and the M50. While being mostly the same as the old signs, it is welcome as a lot of the signs were damaged/stained. About half of the new posts are now two medium posts with crosshatched metal posts in-between instead of one large pole to minimise the damage in case of a crash.LatviaRoad signs in Latvia largely adhere to guidelines.
In detailed design they closely resemble the signs used in Germany.Netherlands. Main article:Road signs in the Netherlands follow the Vienna Convention. Directional signs (which have not been harmonized under the Convention) always use blue as the background colour. The destinations on the sign are printed in white. If the destination is not a town (but an area within town or some other kind of attraction), that destination will be printed in black on a separate white background within the otherwise blue sign.The Netherlands always signposts European road numbers where applicable (i.e., on the advance directional signs, the interchange direction signs and on the ). Dutch national road numbers are placed on a rectangle, with motorways being signposted in white on a red rectangle (as an A xx) and primary roads in black on a yellow rectangle (as N xx). When a motorway changes to a primary road, its number remains the same, but the A is replaced by the N.
So at a certain point the A2 becomes N2, and when it changes to a motorway again, it becomes A2 again.Signs intended for bike-riders always go on white signs with red or green letters.The Dutch typeface, known as ANWB-Ee, is based on the US typeface. A new font, named ANWB-Uu (also known as Redesign), has been developed in 1997 and appears on many recent Dutch signs. On the motorways however the typeface remains the ANWB-Ee or a similar typeface. The language of the signs is typically Dutch, even though bilingual signs may be used, when the information is relevant for tourists.Norway. Upper left and right and middle right are standard directional signs. Lower left is for a commercial facility, and lower right is for a temporary detour.Signs in Norway mostly follow the Vienna Convention, except the polar bear warning sign, which is a white bear on a black background and a red border.These are the directional signs:. Signs for motorways are blue with white text.
Those for regular roads to towns and cities are yellow with black lettering. Signs for industrial areas, commercial facilities etc. Are white with black letters. Signs for tourist attractions, national parks, museums etc. Are brown with white letteringThe signs for road numbering are rectangular, and have this colour scheme:. European routes (E6, E18, etc.) are green with white lettering. National routes are also green with white lettering.
Province owned roads are white with black lettering. Municipality owned roads have the name of the road, instead of a number, and are white with black letteringSweden. Bicycle and mountain bike routes, and routes for vehicle-like transport means are white text on falu red background. Commercial direction signs are black text on grey background with a red dot. Generally valid speed limit of 50 km/h valid within densely built-up areas, e.g. Within urban settings, villages, or towns (starts with sign no.
2.30.1; ends with sign no. 2.53.1) – sometimes applicable even without producing the corresponding sign (no. 2.30.1) on minor roads after entering a settlement (sign no. 4.27) when densely built-up area begins. On mountain roads, priority is given to, firstly, heavy vehicles (lorries and buses), and secondly, upwards-moving vehicles. Mountain postal road sign (starts with sign no.
4.05 and ends with 4.06) indicating priority to public transport on (mountain) roads; drivers must follow instructions given by public bus drivers!. There are more priority signs than usual (often related to the rule).United Kingdom. Main article:Traffic signing in the UK conforms broadly to European norms, though a number of signs are unique to Britain and direction signs omit. The current sign system, introduced on 1 January 1965, was developed in the late 1950s and early 1960s by the Anderson Committee, which established the signing system, and by the, which reformed signing for existing all-purpose roads. (For illustrations of most British road signs, see 'Know your traffic signs' on the website.)The UK remains the only member nation and the only Commonwealth country to use non- measurements for distance and speed, although 'authorised weight' signs have been in metric tonnes since 1981 and there is currently a dual-unit (metric first) option for height and width restriction signage, intended for use on safety grounds. On motorways kilometre signs are visible at intervals of 500 metres (1,600 ft) indicating the distance from the start of the motorway.
(See ).Three colour schemes exist for direction signs:. On motorways they are blue with white lettering. On primary routes they are green with white lettering and yellow route numbers. A non-primary route has white signs with black lettering. A fourth colour scheme, black on yellow, is seen on temporary signs, for example marking a diversionary route avoiding a road closure.Two are specified for British road signs. 'Medium' or Transport 'Heavy' are used for all text on fixed permanent signs and most temporary signage, depending on the colour of the sign and associated text colour; dark text on a white background is normally set in 'Heavy' so that it stands out better. However route numbers on motorway signs use a taller limited character set typeface called 'Motorway'.Signs are generally in all parts of Wales (English/ or Welsh/English), and similar signs are beginning to be seen in parts of the (English/).All signs and their associated regulations can be found in the, as updated by the TSRGD 2008, TSRGD 2011 and TSRGD 2016 and complemented by the various chapters of the 'Traffic Signs Manual'.
Rural highway sign,.Every state and province has different for its own highways, but use standard ones for all federal highways. Many special highways – such as the, and various in the U.S. – have used unique signs. Counties in the US sometimes use a blue sign with yellow letters for numbered, though the use is inconsistent even within states.UnitsDistances on traffic signs generally follow the measurement system in use locally: that is to say, the in all countries of the world except, the United Kingdom, and the United States – although the metric system is used in the UK for all purposes other than the display of road distances and the defining of speed limits, and in the US the Federal Department of Transportation has developed (very rarely used) metric standards for all signs.Languages. Multilingual road signs in in, English, and.Where signs use a language, the recognized language/s of the area is normally used. Signs in most of the US, Canada, Australia, and New Zealand are in English.
Quebec uses, while and the and bridges, in Montreal (as well as some parts in the ), use both English and French, and a number of other provinces and states, such as, and use bilingual French–English signs in certain localities. Puerto Rico (a US territory) and Mexico use Spanish. Within a few miles of the, road signs are often in English and Spanish in places like San Diego, Yuma, and El Paso.
Indigenous languages, mainly as well as some, have been used as well.TypefacesThe typefaces predominantly used on signs in the US and Canada are the (Series B through Series F and Series E Modified). Details of letter shape and spacing for these alphabet series are given in 'Standard Alphabets for Traffic Control Devices', first published by the (BPR) in 1945 and subsequently updated by the (FHWA). It is now part of Standard Highway Signs (SHS), the companion volume to the MUTCD which gives full design details for signfaces.Initially, all of the alphabet series consisted of uppercase letters and digits only, although lowercase extensions were provided for each alphabet series in a 2002 revision of SHS.
Series B through Series F evolved from identically named alphabet series which were introduced in 1927.Straight-stroke letters in the 1927 series were substantially similar to their modern equivalents, but unrounded glyphs were used for letters such as B, C, D, etc., to permit more uniform fabrication of signs by illiterate painters. Some traffic signs, such as the left-turn prohibition sign hanging from this gantry, are lit for better visibility, particularly at night or in inclement weather.The US uses, a typeface, for guide signage; it typically appears on a brown background. Rawlinson has replaced as the official NPS typeface, but some states still use Clarendon for recreational signage., in the past, used uppercase Series D with a custom lowercase alphabet on its freeway guide signs; the most distinctive feature of this typeface is the lack of a dot on lowercase i and j. More recent installations appear to include the dots.The typeface, developed by US researchers to provide improved legibility, is permitted for light legend on dark backgrounds under FHWA interim approval.
Clearview has seen widespread use by state departments of transportation in,. The has also introduced Clearview typeface to some of its newer guide signs along the, but the state of continues to use the FHWA typefaces for signage on its non-tolled Interstates and freeways.In, the Ministry of Transportation for the Province of specifies Clearview for use on its highway guide signs, and its usage has shown up in on the and in and on new installations in, and, as well as street signs in various parts of the province.
The font is also being used on newer signs in,. Main article:road signs are generally influenced both by American and European practices.Warning signs are diamond-shaped with a yellow background for permanent warnings, and an orange background for temporary warnings.
They are somewhat more pictorial than their American counterparts. This is also true for Canadian signage.Regulatory signs also follow European practice, with a white circle with a red border indicating prohibitive actions, and a blue circle indicating mandatory actions. White rectangular signs with a red border indicate lane usage directions. Information and direction signs are rectangular, with a green background indicating a, a blue background for all other roads and all services (except in some, where directional signage is white), and a brown background for tourist attractions.Before 1987, most road signs had black backgrounds – diamonds indicated warnings, and rectangles indicated regulatory actions (with the exception of the Give Way sign (an inverted trapezium), and Stop sign and speed limit signs (which were the same as today)). Information signs were yellow, and direction signage was green on motorways and black everywhere else. Speed bump sign in.Road signs in, and vary from country to country. For the most part, conventions in signage tend to resemble United States signage conventions more so than European and Asian conventions.
For example, warning signs are typically diamond-shaped and yellow rather than triangular and white. Some variations include the 'Parking' and 'No Parking' signs, which contain either a letter E or P, depending on which word is used locally for 'Parking' ( estacionamiento or parqueo, estacionamento), as well as the Stop sign, which usually reads 'Pare' or 'Alto'. Notable exceptions include speed limit signs, which follow the European conventions, and the 'No Entry' sign, often replaced with a crossed upwards arrow.ColombiaTraffic signs in Colombia are classified into three categories:. Warning signs. Mandatory signs. Information signs.Warning signs are very similar to warning signs in United States. They are yellow diamond-shaped with a black symbol (the yellow colour is changed to an orange colour in areas under construction).
In certain cases, the yellow colour is shifted to fluorescent yellow (in the School area sign and Chevron sign).Mandatory signs are similar to European signs. They are circular with a red border, a white background and a black symbol.
Stop sign and Yield sign are as European, except the word 'Stop' is changed for 'Pare' and the Yield sign has no letters, it is a red triangle with white centre.Information signs have many shapes and colours. Principally they are blue with white symbols and in many cases these signs have an information letter below the symbol.SurinameRoad signs in Suriname are particularly modelled on the since Suriname is a former Dutch colony, although traffic drives on the left.
Writes: Citylab has the news that the U.S. Federal Highway Administration is of the.
Clearview was made to improve upon its predecessor, a 1940s font called Highway Gothic. Certain letters appeared to pose visibility problems, especially those with tight interstices (or internal spacing)—namely lowercase e, a, and s. At night, any of these reflective letters might appear to be a lowercase o in the glare of headlights. By opening up these letterforms, and mixing lowercase and uppercase styles, Clearview aimed to improve how these reflective highway signs read.Now, just 12 years later, the FHWA is reversing itself: 'After more than a decade of analysis, we learned—among other things—that Clearview actually compromises the legibility of signs in negative-contrast color orientations, such as those with black letters on white or yellow backgrounds like Speed Limit and Warning signs,' said Doug Hecox, a FHWA spokesperson, in an email. The FHWA has not yet provided any research on Clearview that disproves the early claims about the font's benefits.
But there is at least one factor that clearly distinguishes it from Highway Gothic: cost. Jurisdictions that adopt Clearview must purchase a standard license for type, a one-time charge of between $175 (for one font) and $795 (for the full 13-font typeface family) and up, depending on the number of workstations.That doesn't seems like a very good use of tax money, for something that can be nondestructively reused once created.
I've actually had serious conversations with serious people about the font used on signs. It is not, technically, my area of expertise but I'm expected to know it, have hired someone familiar with it, or to have a consultant on hand for it. Well no, now I'm expected to be retired.While I realize you were joking. How familiar are people with it? How well is its contrast with the various lighting expectations? How much information can be conveyed in the same space?Given my druthers, and not being an expert, I'd like to see Helvetica be tested for use. So long as certain highways (namely those that are federally owned and under their authority) meet a minimal criteria, the municipality is allowed to enact most anything it wants.
Of course, wide variations would be bad as they would lead to confusion and unfamiliarity.For the English language, Helvetica seems to be a good choice. If, on the off chance, you're interested - there's actually a movie by that name. It's a documentary (of course, that's all I watch) and surprisingly interesting and informative. I watched it because I knew a bit about it but it turned out to be much better than one might expect.
(A documentary about fonts???)I'm also partial to some of the Ariel (or is it Arial) fonts. I'm not sure that they'd make good signage due to their width of the letter body (those crazy bastards have a specific name for all that stuff - including stuff like serifs, kerning, etc) and I'm not sure about Helvetica - I am not an expert.
I have hired and consulted with experts and passed their recommendations along. (Usually it's basically, 'How the hell should I know and it's not like they're actually going to listen.
Go with the default. At least it works.) So, my suggestion is that they look into it. I'd hate to make an authoritative statement when I am not, in fact, an authority.In the course of my professional career, I've had many discussions about signs and their fonts.
No, I did not recommend the font you hate. That was some other guy or they didn't listen to me. It's never my fault, after all. I did not, however, expect to see it on Slashdot - ever. I didn't even submit this. So, if you have any questions about fonts and signage, I'm sure plenty of people here have an opinion on the matter. I've really only got suggestions.
There exist actual experts on this topic. I kind of doubt any of us are.
I'm moderately familiar so I'm sure I'll be amused by the contents of the thread. So long as their signs are in English, that'd be a good idea. Non-English fonts will not have (necessarily) the same appeal - even if they have English characters.I shit you not, there are people who have devoted their entire careers to this. They often have a font portfolio (observation) that they're excited to show you. They have a few that are 'going to be a real impact some day.'
I've gotten drunk with some and even paid for all the drinks.Ever want to get to know a new industry? Take a few of the peopl. Helvetica is great (have seen it), but has the same shortcomings as the font they're switching back to. Clearview is a font specifically designed to be readable from a greater distance. If you look at the lowercase 'e' or 'a', what it specifically does is enlarge the holes and gaps so that they are more distinguishable even when out of focus. And when you're right at the limits, distancewise, of your vision, you are better able to distinguish one similar letter from another and read the sign that much so. If you love Comic Sans, or if you hate Comic Sans, have a look at what Comic Sans wanted to be when it grew up: comicneue.com.You should also take a look at the Filmotype Apache/August/Beaver family.
It's a 'casual serif', which has been digitized under the names URW Apache, Panache Stanley and Sixpack, Cochise, Toledo, and dafont.com. Respected businesses use this family for their corporate branding, including ABCmouse Early Learning Academy and Harris Teeter Neighborhood Food and Pharmacy. It balances the bounciness and honesty of a hand-lettering typeface and the form variety of a dyslexia-friendly typeface with the dignity of a serif, and the best part is that it isn't Comic Sans.
The problem is that some of the 'uniqueness' / charm of Comic Sans is lost with Comic Neue.Whether you think this is a good thing (or bad) thing will depend if you hate (or like) hate Comic Sans, respectively.The problem is when you 'quantize' the glyph's strokes the font becomes 'sterile' and loses that 'human touch' or aspect.To give an analogy, there is a reason music is NOT precisely played on the beat; a human has some very subtle variation giving it a 'organic' feel. Once you quantize everything to precisely 1 / # ms music sounds 'robotic', sterile, bland. Even more so with swing.I agree with designforhackers.com. So, the story of Comic Sans is not that of a really terrible font, but rather of a mediocre font, used incorrectly on a massive scale.The problem with all the people hating Comic Sans is that:a) they tend to be self-righteous, pretentious font connoisseurs, andb) Not realizing 'Most People Don't Give a Fuck.' I'm not defending Comic Sans saying it is a great font - it isn't. It's kerning sucks.But to blinding hate a font without understanding what few (or even one) strengths it has is just plain ignorance.That Comic Neue website is not bad, but it really needs to show the context of all three fonts (Comic Sans, Comic Neue Light, and Comic Neue Angular Light), so people can specifically see what is different / changed.
While the argument continues to rage about whether sans serifsare easier to read than serif fonts in text copy, sans seriftypefaces, because their letter shapes are simpler, have beenproven to be slightly more legible than their serifed cousins.I agree that serif fonts are generally more readable thansans-serif fonts. Having to read a book that is entirelysans-serif is a chore. The serifed fonts are usually easier toread because the serifs help guide your eye to scan an entireline of text. But for road signs, it is more important torecognize words than to scan lines. That's why the. Though if they want to maximize readability, why aren't the usingfonts with the little training wheels specially designed to makeletters faster to read and easier to recognize in bad readingconditions, what's the name: SERIF fonts!For road signs, they don't want to maximize readability, they wantto maximize legibility, which is not the same thing.No, but serif fonts are also more legible.
It was previously believed sans-serif were better at this, but new research is proving it wrong. When we can't see a shape clearly we guess details, this is why with a sans-serif fonts, c e a all look like o or s (depending on the person) at a distiance. Add serifs to those shapes, and the breaks in round shape warns the brain that it is not an o. Dude, just talking about the font files - the fact that they've already done the research, know what they want in a font, and are concerned that they are paying $795 per jurisdiction for privilege of using this knowledge they have already researched and paid for.So, the perfectly legal workaround in this instance, due to the laws of the land which deny copyright protection to typefaces, is to copy the typeface - make a new font file that works like the other font file, but has different names. Use the tool.
Thanks for the impassioned pile of gibberish, I did at least skim it;-)And, the gist I get is that they are too stuck in their ways to even consider qualifying a competent font without the full round of payola, ahem, studies and approvals to back it up. Mine was just a reaction to the line in the summary that said they are concerned about having to pay $795 for the font, which seems like peanuts to me if this jurisdiction prints even one big highway sign with it (installation costs alone should be dwarfin. Open Source highway gothic font created by Red Hat.In a crowded and eye-searing web page, Red Hat describes Overpass is a web font family 'inspired' by Highway Gothic. In truly microscopic type, Red Hat concludes by saying that 'Today's enterprise brands all have distinct typographic expressions. In the software arena, Overpass is strongly aligned to the Red Hat brand.'
To me, this reads as something less than an unqualified commitment to open source licensing. What matters now, however, is that nowhere does Red Hat endorse the use of Overpass for highwa.
To save $175? Cause if so your cutting off your nose to spite your ignorant face.You do realize the paint on each sign (EACH) probably costs more than that.And with the OSS font you get? A shitty font because people who are good at spending the many long hours of work required to make good fonts DONT FUCKING DO IT FOR FREE.You guys get all uppity about stupid shit. If the fact that some designer at some company had to buy the font before the could make signs is irrelevant. And very pro capitalism, etc bla bla.But. How can our Federal Highway Administration go about researching and the setting a standard for a font. And then be so stupid as to not procure rights to that font and then license them to every other agency/company at no cost?As a republican.
This is the kind of thing I expect my government TO do. I know wikipedia says 'It was developed by independent researchers with the help of the Texas Transportation Institute and the Pennsylvania Transportation Institute, under the supervision of the Federal Highway Administration (FHWA),' why didn't any of these agencies say 'So. We're going to pay you a huge pile of money. For this font.' Why didn't any of these agencies say 'So. We're going to pay you a huge pile of money. For this font.'
Because spending large piles of money is exactly what Republican's don't want to do; plus, being pro-business, it was in their interests to let some third-party company profit from this mandate. I also don't think it was a required mandate or a standard; if a jurisdiction didn't want to pay for Clearview, they could probably still use Highway Gothic. Clearview was just the other approved font. I think this is part of the reason for the rise of the tea party and their attitudes towards mainstream moderate Republicans.
The hypocrisy of the political parties is evident; both parties give out subsidies to their friends but then complain when the other party does the same thing. The Republican party really has not been an example of fiscal prudence despite marketing itself as such. Since we're de-facto a two party system in a country with more than two viewpoints, both parties are an alliance of st. Why didn't any of these agencies say 'So. We're going to pay you a huge pile of money. For this font.' Because spending large piles of money outside of their own pet interests is exactly what Republican's don't want to do; plus, being pro-business, it was in their interests to let some third-party company profit from this mandate.
I also don't think it was a required mandate or a standard; if a jurisdiction didn't want to pay for Clearview, they could probably still use Highway Gothic. Clearview was just the other approved font.FTFYRepublicans haven't done anything any better than other politicians when it comes to eradicating public debt.And no I'm not a democrat. I dislike all politicians pretty much equally. As a republican too, I can explain why they didn't secure the license for the font they paid to develop. It's government stupidity silly.You see, the government wastes money, and time in abundance while producing garbage because there is no real motivation to be efficient and quick or to fulfill the users' needs built into the system.
This is unlike capitalism where being efficient and fast is considered a virtue and if you don't produce what the consumer wants you die. Well, unless you are 'to big to fail' or some group of progressives get the idea they have to bail you out.But you knew that anyway.Personally, I think that anything like this, fonts, software, data collections that the government pays to get developed should be made available to the general public by default. All contracts should have boilerplate language designed to ensure this. Only things related to national security and defense should be allowed to remain out of the public eye, but even those should be 'FREE of license costs' forever. And if you don't produce what the consumer wants you dieFucking explain DRM then.Digital Rights Management is not something the customer wants? I don't think you can really say that.
I think it IS what the customer wants, given the other possible options.Sure, you may not like it, but you put up with it because it gives you the ability to use digital content for a reasonable license fee. If DRM didn't exist, the license fees would be much higher because many would just 'share' instead of 'buying a license' to get the content. Remember all those 'file sharing' services that got run o. The only thing we can do is get rid of government.Even the framers didn't like that idea and assigned the government specific (albeit limited) tasks, such as providing for a common defense. Of course there are the tree branches of government designed to maintain proper laws, enforce the law and interpret the law. One branch which seems hell bent on growing beyond all reasonable size and cost, one on writing just one more law to justify it's existence and one who's members have forgotten that their primary purpose is NOT to write law but apply the laws a. It's a contracted product, when the product arrives it is owned by the government.
If they make sure that's in the contract of course. Nobody is harmed because if they company required ongoing royalties it would not have accepted the contract in the first place.But government entities make shortcuts. They know how extremely long and tedious a normal process takes.
They're required by law to put things up for a bid, but that takes forever. They also can't make any low level decisions, it all has to be p. Because there's a disconnect in the Republican Party at times. There's a conflict between fiscal reponsibility (saving money) versus supporting businesses (promoting the market). So they will on the same day complain about government waste in the morning and then provide huge subsidies to their friends in the afternoon.As for open source, many republican and democratic politicians despise it. Too socialist, not enough American jobs created, potentionally developed by enemies of the US, no lobbying gifts. Certain states decided that it had better legibility, due to the research on it, than the freely available highway fonts (A-E).
I know of one state that uses the font exclusively, North Dakota. AFAIK this font isn't in wide use.Safety is all the matters in this regard, if the commercial font really does have better the standard fonts then it should be used. Yea it would be great if the font is freely available and all that but what matters above all is the legibility.
If the font can be read at a greater di. That doesn't seems like a very good use of tax money, for something that can be nondestructively reused once created.True, but it's a relatively small amount of money. It's not completely out of whack with what commercial enterprises pay for non-free fonts. And, to be honest, if someone invested in this project thinking 'Hmm, if I invest on research into improving something with a direct affect on road safety and transportation efficiency, I'll make money!'
Not a bad thing. Beats 'Hmm, if I invest in research on blowing people up, the government will give me money!' Anyway.Copyright isn't a terrible idea, just one that's abused from time to time. The target audience for this font can easily afford the money they're asking for, and it's a worthy product if the font does what it's designed to do.
(Whether that's true is a separate issue from 'Should we occasionally pay for fonts?' It's not completely out of whack with what commercial enterprises pay for non-free fontsExcept it is totally out of what. Normal fonts are created speculatively and then licensed to interested parties.This font was practically a work for hire in everything but name, I wouldn't be surprised to hear they were actually paid to create it up front, and then now we still have to license it back, for a font that's standardized accross a nationwide highway network.
The purpose for which it was originally commissioned.WORST case it should be licensed once for the nations highways. If the designer wants to go out and try and license it to Mexico too. That's fine, but the USA should only have to pay once to use it on any signage anywhere it wants. $795 (a one-time license, max price). 12,000 jurisdictions in the US (100% of all jurisdictions) / 224,000,000 adults = 4.2 cents.I see no evidence that the US Government paid for it to be produced; I see that it was developed by an independent business with the aid (labor) of two state highway administrations and the oversight of a government administration. That sounds like the U.S. Government provided oversight as a customer seeking to license a product, not that it paid to have a product produced u.
Those prices are down right cheap. Some fonts are $1000/per use one billboard is a use, one street sign is a use. But cumulatively it adds up to a whole lot of money for tax payers.So lets agree there are two dimensions to this argument whether the Clearview font is superior which is the bulk of the article and whether the flame bait trailing paragraph means that we need to fix the economics.Designing a font is a lot more work than you think if your goal is something legible unlike say Comic Sans. Try pricing out any Professional tool or Software. AutoCAD is $1,680/year, Adobe CC is $700 / year. It's not like every desktop in the government is going to have this software.Those professional software tools you mention both have periodic updates and customer support.
Those things have ongoing costs. A font is designed once and most are never updated. Updating a font and keeping the same name probably would cause big problems! I realize that a professional-level font takes time to create, but once it is done, it is done. Installing a font is trivial and software problems with a properly designed font are rare. Ongoing licensing costs are just greed and provide no value.